Edwards supporters protest Wynn fundraiserWASHINGTON D.C. - With the Democratic Fourth Congressional District primary five weeks away, the campaigns for challenger Donna Edwards and incumbent Al Wynn came head to head today just a block from the United States Capitol.
Wynn, scheduled to speak at a morning fundraiser in the offices of Entergy, a prominent energy lobbying firm, collided with protesters from the Edwards campaign as he stepped out of his car to enter the building on the corner of Constitution and Louisiana Avenues.
Wynn, escorted by office security, passed by signs reading, “Al Wynn has got to go,” “PACs over people,” and “Dirty money, dirty congress.” Once inside the building, protesters began chanting to passing cars, “Hey hey, ho ho, Al Wynn has got to go!”
The Edwards campaign wrapped the protest into a theme that, her campaign contends, is resonating with voters in the District and around the country: change.
“We are in a tidal wave of change in this country,” Edwards, appearing after the confrontation, told reporters. “I believe that change is good, and needed.”
Edwards, pointing out that Wynn sits on the Energy and Commerce Committee, charged that Wynn’s fundraising from the lobbying group called into question whether he could fairly legislate on nuclear and environmental issues. “This is not the way to legislate public policy,” she said. “It’s incumbent upon voters to look at his record.” Supporters chanted and waved signs behind her. “Follow the money,” she said. “That will tell you what his policies will be.”
Edwards vowed that she would be different. “I will return politics and policy to the people,” she said, adding that if elected she would not take money from special interests.
Later in the morning the Wynn campaign fired back, charging that the Arca Foundation, where Edwards is the executive director, holds 1.8 million dollars in investments in oil and gas companies such Exxon Mobile and Halliburton. It also said that Edwards’ campaign had received money from Thomas Steyer, a managing partner and founder of Farallon Capital, a hedge fund that has investments in Halliburton.
“Ms. Edwards actions today are merely a desperate attempt to mislead the voters, create a smokescreen and redirect scrutiny away from her own questionable fundraising activities and investments and ties to Halliburton,” Wynn campaign manager Lori Sherwood said.
Prominent liberal blogger Matt Stoller, appearing at the protest, said it was “remarkable” that Wynn would appear at the fundraiser just weeks before the primary election.
“My guess is Wynn doesn’t see anything wrong with it,” Stoller said.
As volunteers waited for Wynn to emerge from the building, Edwards commended them for their efforts.
“Hold him accountable,” she said to cheers. “Hold him accountable.”
This week's Winners & Losers. | CLICK HERE >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
Well, I must say that I am totally shocked and amazed by the final outcome on the commission convened by Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) to study the ... >
I believe in recycling but this is ridiculous.
So what does it mean when Andy Harris’ congressional campaign has to recycle old TV ad material? ... >
Balance is one thing
I understand the impulse to "air both sides" but Wynn's response here is so intellectually bankrupt that I'm amazed it wasn't scrutinized.
Arca is effectively a stockholder in the industries listed above. Professional investors grow the equity, and the foudnation director distributes it to selected noble causes. Wynn is a recipient of campaign donations. The difference is stark and Wynn's attempts to blur the lines are laughable.
When has a Fortune 500 company ever come to its stockholders for political favors? Selling stock and buying a Congressman are completely different equations. This is a ridiculous smear and doesn't answer the serious ethical concerns of Wynn taking money from the industries he regulates while Congress is in session.
Al Says "Behaving Like Him is Bad"
Al Wynn has been taking industry money for years and his votes in Congress suggest that money was not wasted by special interests.
And however flawed Al Wynn's attack against Donna Edwards (Donna does not direct the investment decisions of her employer), it speaks volumes that Al's accusations of wrong-doing are the same missteps. He says behaving like him is "just as bad". What does that say of Al's judgment?
I am embarrassed by my representation (lack of) in Congress. Let's go with change - let's go with Donna Edwards.
Post new comment