June 10, 2008 - 10:49am

Brinkley's silent treatment

So Monday came and went, and none of those who were talking so cavalierly about giving Republican state Senate Minority Leader David Brinkley the boot made their move. Not atypical of the political set.

One person heard that Brinkley might have given a statement to the Sun yesterday, but that turned out to be nothing. Nope. It's pretty clear he won't say anything for some time.

Brinkley's silence is another case of 'out of sight, out of mind.' If he doesn't address the situation, he won't be pressed for details about it. If he doesn't say whether he'll retain his leadership position, he won't face criticism over his decision.

As we wrote last week, some of Brinkley's supporters feel in a jam. They would be there for him -- if only they knew where he was. They didn't want to come out in support of him to only have him resign his leadership post. But his decision to remain quiet has convinced them that he has chosen to retain his position, to sit tight and hope it will remain under wraps. Several agreed that the details of the domestic disturbance that came out in the Frederick News-Post over the weekend was actually good for Brinkley -- heightening the personal aspects of this issue and distracting from questions involving state funds.

His opponents, meanwhile, continue to wait. And they may just build the case against him throughout the fall. The consensus choice to replace Brinkley would be Senate Minority Whip Allan Kittleman. He's been loyal to Brinkley so far, but will he remain so? Then again, would it really be worth it to tear down a friend to take charge of the minority party?

So what are the results? Brinkley now knows who his real friends are. State Sen. Alex Mooney has a clearer primary field for U.S. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett's seat when he retires. There may be a leadership fight this fall. And the state GOP is so powerless and uncompetitive at the moment that no one cares what their Senate minority leader does.

Comments

To A Non and Ttop


Ttop -

Clearly, Mike Miller's training is working well when he has Senators in his own camp having their homes raided by the Feds.

A Non-

How about this:

Demos Deny Dishonorable Detritus

Republicans Reclusive Regarding Relations

Leagues of difference between what Brinkley MAY have done, and what we know Uly Currie DID do.

06/12/08 7:37 am

What we have to understand


What we have to understand is when we see the symbol (R) after a politician's name, that means:

Ready Reluctant to Rat Republicans.

when we see the symbol (D) after a politician's name, that means:

Dems Definately Discussed Despite Decorum.

06/11/08 5:27 pm

He serves on the Joint


He serves on the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethics too. Didn't Mike Miller require senators to attend an ethics training last year? Working well.

06/10/08 11:38 pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.