June 3, 2008 - 10:40am
News

A lesson from "Ellen Sourgrapes"

Esteemed political analyst Charlie Cook has some advice for Hillary Clinton: 'If you care about your future, don't pull an Ellen Sauerbrey!'

Noting how close and hard-fought this Democratic presidential primary has been, Cook implores Clinton to learn from other photo-finish losers -- like Saurbrey's losing 1994 gubernatorial campaign.

The phantom culprit in this case was not a flawed caucus or delegate allocation system; they were quite literally phantoms. In other words, dead people in Baltimore rising from the grave to cast their ballots. Yet she hung around well after her claims could be vindicated and ended up looking like a nuisance to the business of government.

Here's how Cook puts it.

In the 1994 Maryland governor's race, Democrat Parris Glendening, the county executive for Prince George's County, edged Ellen Sauerbrey, the state House of Delegates Republican leader, by a scant 5,993 votes out of more than 1.4 million cast.

Some Republicans said they smelled foul play, although a subsequent bipartisan investigation found none. Sauerbrey fought and fought, long after it was clear that she would not prevail, earning her the moniker, "Ellen Sourgrapes."

In the 1998 rematch, though Glendening's popularity was on the wane, Sauerbrey's mishandling of the recount likely prevented her from taking advantage of the situation and she lost, 55-45 percent.

 Read the full article here.

WALLY EDGE can be reached via email at politickermd@aol.com.

Comments

You forgot to explain that


You forgot to explain that Ellen's high powered legal team and hundreds of thousands of dollars along with thousands of paid and volunteer GOP manhours produced absolutely no evidence to back up the claims of voter fraud.

Hence, the ruling from the judge you just tried to smear with the implication that he took a gift for ruling as he did.

Your first mistake was convincing her followers that such rumors of fraud were true and manufacturing a huge PR campaign that had her supporters believing it, regardless of the facts.

But once you start down a fraudulent path of baseless charges, you found it's difficult to slow it down without admitting your mistake.

I attended the trial and laughed at her case along with everyone else.

06/06/08 11:38 am

Ellen "Sourgrapes" Sauerbrey


Cook's article was inaccurate. The investigation of vote fraud was not bi-partisan. There was no recount procedure in Maryland law and the only alternative was to go to court. The Democrat appointed judge who threw out the case after saying in court that he voted for Sauerbrey was awarded with a promotion to a higher court. In 1998 Ellen lost because she did not take the advice not to change one thing in her campaign in 1994 and the first thing she did was replace her popular Lt. Governor candidate Paul Rappaport and moved her positions to the center and lost a substantial number of the right of center voters. R.W. Montalto, 1994 Campaign Manager for Ellen Sauerbrey

06/04/08 6:52 am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.