Who's right in the debate over amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act?

CARDIN. Retroactive immunity to telecoms "creates a dangerous precedent for [government and companies] to violate the law.
62%
MIKULSKI. "[T]his is not immunity for any individual – this is narrowly targeted just for the telecommunications companies."
38%
Suggest for national site: 
Suggest for national site

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.