In the recent war of letters between Peter Franchot and Mike Miller, who wins the war of words?

Suggest for national site: 
Suggest for national site

Comments

Miller's Folly


Explain to me how Mike Miller's public letter serves anything except Mike Miller's elephantine ego.

If you pop open a Webster's, you'll see a photo of the old man as a definition of hubris.

My advice to Mr. Franchot - step back and allow Mike Miller's rants and raves to be seen as the onset of senility.

He must be drinking the same Annapolis juice as William Donald Schaffer was. It's time for this man, humble enough to name the new Senate office building after himself, to fade away.

Another question to ask - why do Senators like Frosh, Middleton or Pugh mount a challenge to the President? Even the Prince George's Delegation would endorse a new leader.

09/16/08 9:59 am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.