In case you were not within an ear shot of the nation’s capital, Governor Martin O’Malley made a couple of radio runs this past week, where he took ample opportunities to take shots at his predecessor, now-former Governor Robert Ehrlich.
It’s no secret that the current governor’s job approval rating is down from a year ago, way down, in the 30s. His reasoning behind that is because he raised taxes. That was what he told WTOP (103.5FM) political analyst Mark Plotkin, but he added that it was a bit more complicated than that. “We were left a $1.7 billion deficit by our predecessor that red ink came crashing on us. We had to make a lot of cuts and we also had to push a lot of unpopular measures and nobody ever stands up and applauds.”
If I am not mistaken, I believe that Ehrlich (R) left O’Malley (D) with a surplus and it was widely reported that the Governor would not face a deficit in his first year however, one would happen down the road. That was a pretty short road wasn’t it? This time last year we were hearing about deficits ranging from $1.3-1.7 billion. It should also be noted that the last democratic governor that was in office, Parris Glendening, left Ehrlich with a $2 billion deficit.
The deficit was not the only thing that O’Malley blamed Ehrlich for. This past Friday on WAMU (88.5FM), the Governor said that Ehrlich was the reason that the state office of tourism did not promote places to visit in the free state. “We are very critical of my predecessor for in essence hijacking tourism dollars that should have been promoting great destinations like Garrett County, Ocean City [and] the Inner Harbor of Baltimore. Instead of using them for that, he used them to entirely to promote his image and his name and his face and I felt that was wrong…”
O’Malley on both appearances blamed his predecessor for not spending enough money on school construction, contrasting the differences between how much his administration spent when compared to the previous one. On WAMU, he mentioned that he had to make unpopular choices such as raising the sales tax by a penny stating that Maryland was ranked 42nd in regards to a tax burden. I have to ask and if you want to clarify this for me please email me…is having a low tax burden all that bad? But, I digress.
O’Malley for the past 14 months has blamed Ehrlich for something. This time last year, I believe that he was gloating at the fact that he won the election. This year, I believe that he is frustrated because he was essentially not given the free pass he enjoyed in Baltimore as Mayor. The first sign of this was watching him talk with WJZ-TV (Channel 13) reporter Pat Warren towards the end of the last General Assembly session, where he stated that this was the toughest year he ever had in public service, and it shows. In the most recent Gonzales poll released in March, he actually dropped two points in his job approval rating to 37 percent.
I think that it is fair to start asking the question, when is Governor Martin J. O’Malley going to realize that not everything is Robert Ehrlich’s fault? When is the governor going to say that raising taxes might not have been a good idea, especially going into an election year where the economy is uncertain? Mr. O’Malley at this point is more concerned about his image as opposed to the working citizens of Maryland that he used to get into office. Ehrlich surely wasn’t doing a bad job considering the fact that he had higher job approval ratings than the current governor.
Many people thought that maybe with a democratic governor, there would be a bit of maturity in Annapolis and the general assembly would not engage in petty squabbles and start making real decisions. They were only half right. The partisan squabbling might have gone to a minimum (I guess it would with both houses seating over 70% democrat) but they have not made any real decisions. House Speaker Michael Busch (D-Dist. 30) has been aiming to raise the sales tax during the Ehrlich Administration, so that was not a tough decision considering many in the house and senate would follow the governor. And we all know what happened with the slots bill, they passed the buck to us.
Governor O’Malley’s reasoning behind throwing mud at Ehrlich is looking more insane by the day. I am sure that he will continue to find ways to blame Ehrlich in order to make up for his lack of leadership in taking on tough issues as time goes on. However, if he is still blaming Ehrlich for issues this time next year, Marylanders will seriously have to take a second look at O’Malley.
kennyburns@marylandpolitics.us
As we celebrate the 232nd anniversary of our nation's independence at Philadelphia tomorrow, today should be when we take note of what occured in ... >
Consider this piece to be my no confidence vote in Prince George’s County Executive Jack Johnson (D). OK, to be fair, I never had confidence in ... >
Better late than never. Well, some folks think so anyway.
The truth is, last weekend’s program featuring talk radio host Bob Ehrlich ... >
Not holding Democrats to
Not holding Democrats to different standards than Republicans IS an original thought for so-called conservatives and Republicans, today. Their "do as I say, not as I do" philosophy is a loser.
Ehrlich already spent what he called a surplus. He put the money in a dedicated purposes account and was going to spend it on balancing the budget. Is that what you call squandering? Of course, the voters took away his opportunity to do what he had already set into motion.
Who was the governor when the PSC gave BGE a 72% irreversible rate hike? Who appointed 2 Republican delegates who voted for deregulation to the PSC? Who made one of them, an expert on deregulation according to Ehrlich who helped write the bill, to be the chair of the Ehrlich PSC?
What said "72% won't stand?"
Is it the same guy who keeps trying to deny his responsibility?
I am sure you don't think it was Ehrlich. But it was.
Thank you for your honesty. The General Assembly did trim back the wild spending of Ehrlich in his last year in office and every previous year. On that you are correct, sir.
"A whopping 13% before the
"A whopping 13% before the House and Senate cut it back?"
The House and Senate CAN ONLY cut. They can NOT ADD. An original thought may be more appropo here.
As for Ehrlich, he did propose a big budget. He also left a big surplus. O'Malley knew the pitfalls to come and had every opportunity to change course. He blamed Ehrlich for BGE, not enough education $$, too many fees... and he came into office and spent more than Ehrlich did, squandered a surplus, passed the largest tax hike in Maryland history and yes put more money into school construction, but still didn't fund the GCEI. It isn't a record I would be proud of if I were O'Malley.
There was no surplus. No
There was no surplus.
No one even believes that fake spin anymore.
What was Bob's last budget proposal? A whopping 13% before the House and Senate cut it back?
Blame game? It ain't a game when it's the truth.
O'Malley blamed Ehrlich on
O'Malley blamed Ehrlich on tourism? When Bob Ehrlich started in 2003 they were 19 million visitors to Maryland a year. When he left in January of 2007, there were 28 million visitors a year. O'Taxey, how did he hamstring tourism?
As for 'deficits' that "Martin solved." Aren't we in a new deficit without slots? And who said slots shouldn't be a pangea? That it is morally bankrupt to use slots to fund education? If you're inching towards Martin O'Taxey then you would be right!
O'Malley inherited a rainy day fund with nearly $2 billion in it. Instead of 3% growth, he pursued nearly 10% spending growth. Then the following year he wanted 5% more growth, but wow, we were in a deficit. If you increase your spending 15%, eat up a rainy day fund, and blame your predecessor then you are pretty pathetic.
Want some cheese with that whine?
I guess historical facts are a thorn in Bob's backside.
He did what he did and he would rather not discuss it.
Thanks to Paul and Greg and the other guy, he doesn't have to, directly.
Yes Mr Burns you are
Yes Mr Burns you are mistaken. The surplus was a little over 400m cash on hand at the end of the fiscal year (July 1, 2006). New increased costs (not reined in) were in excess of 2.0 billion dollars. It like saying everything is okay because I have money in my savings account when you have incoming credit card bills for the Hummer you just bought and the vacations you just took. State Budgets from 2002 to 2006 were balanced by spending down savings accounts held in various places. By 2006 those savings accounts were gone but there was 400m in the one account-hence the technical truth of a "surplus".
Yeah, Ehrlich was perfect in
Yeah, Ehrlich was perfect in every way and that poopie-head NO'Malley sucks! Oh if only Ehrich was still our beloved governor, everything would be just peachy! Don't blame any Republicon for Anything - they all voted for Ehrlich!!!
Post new comment