October 1, 2008 - 6:58pm
News

Anti-slots group: Take those ads off the air

Anti-slots group Marylanders United to Stop Slots wants WBAL-AM to pull two ads being aired by its pro-slots rival organization.

"These advertisements are false and misleading, and knowingly misstate facts and positions on the issue of Question 2, the slots constitutional amendment on the ballot this fall," wrote the group's senior advisor, Scott Arceneaux, in a letter to WBAL-FM. The letter was in reference to two ads being run by the pro-slots group For Maryland For Our Future.

According to Arceneaux, one ad says slots will guarantee $650 million in new education funding each year. "Simply put, this is a lie," he said.

The second ad, Arceneaux says, made false statements about anti-slots organizations - such as his own.

"The ad makes the claim that those opposing slots have proposed a $700 million tax increase to make up for an alleged and, frankly made up, short fall of $700 million. The anti-slots groups in this campaign have made no such proposal," he said.

But Steve Kearney, a spokesperson for For Maryland For Our Future claims that's exactly what anti-slots groups have said.

"They can't expect to get away with talking about raising taxes in Montgomery County and cutting services in the rest of the state and not get caught," Kearney told PolitickerMD.com.

Kearny called the actions a stunt.

"This is what campaigns that are losing always do," he said. "This discussion needs to be truthful and needs to talk about the real choices Maryland faces."

Voters will decide on November's ballot if the state constitution should be amended to allow no more than 15,000 slot machine installations at five different locations across the state.

The slots referendum has become one of the most heated issues in the state. Proponents argue the slots will provide necessary funding for the state's education infrastructure and will help close the budget deficit. Opponents believe the revenue projections are overly optimistic, the ballot's language is misleading and the problems associated with gambling far outweigh the benefits.

The controversy has lead to the formation of various groups lobbying in support of and against the passage of November's slots referendum.

DANNY REITER is a PolitickerMD.com Reporter and can be reached via email at Daniel.reiter@politicker.com.

Comments

Slots Vs Anti Slots


I am against slots in MD but asking the pro slots group to take the ads off the air??? Wake up and get your message on Television to fight this battle or you will be hearing the sound of coins.

10/13/08 8:08 pm

Voters - check Australia's experience before voting


Maryland voters need to look no further than the experience of slots (known as pokies or poker machines) in Australia. The situation has now got so bad that the annual wealth transfer from families to modern day robber barons who control the pokies is approaching double the profits of the countries biggest banks, telecommunication companies and retail property groups. A Federal Senate Inquiry into Poker Machine Harm minimisation is currenty in progress but the industry is now very rich and powerful and can lobby to keep the situation exactly as it is. Maryland voters should learn from the experience in Australia, which they can do at www.makepokiessafe.com . They could also listen to Tim Costello, Chief Executive of World Vision talk about the pokies crisis at http://livenews.com.au/MultimediaPopUp.aspx?id=98278&cat=38

10/02/08 10:49 am

Political ads that lie?


I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked.

I'm against slots too, but the anti-slots forces need to stop whining and start making their own case.

This is politics, kids. This is how the game is played.

10/02/08 9:06 am

Free or Not?


Is America free or not? That is the real question here. Why should we allow legalistic Pharisees take away our freedoms? If I want to play poker (a game of skill where you determine the odds) or waste time on a slot machine (a game with really bad odds and no skill), why am I not free to do so? Either we live in a free country or we live in a nanny state? Which is it?

10/01/08 9:19 pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.